SamaritansRadar Twitter monitoring system thoughts

Mental health care: good, bad, or just plain ugly?

Moderator: embleton

User avatar
embleton
Site Admin
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:40 pm
Location: Plymouth
Contact:

Re: SamaritansRadar Twitter monitoring system thoughts

Post by embleton » Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:18 pm

I'm out of this discussion, as I've been accused by @Sectioned_ that I'm expressing thoughts that are stigmatising to those with severe mental illnesses, when I suffer with such a condition myself. I question whether those with severe mental issues can express themselves sufficiently to fight a battle of such magnitude without putting themselves at risk. And I have been sectioned under civil sections on several occasions myself, and like others suffering such issues am not a criminal. As a severe mental health sufferer who has not only been stigmatised and marginalised by the populous but also by those suffering themselves, what a waste of time the direction of this debate is going!

User avatar
embleton
Site Admin
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:40 pm
Location: Plymouth
Contact:

Re: SamaritansRadar Twitter monitoring system thoughts

Post by embleton » Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:07 pm

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) have ruled that the Radar system did indeed fail to comply with the data protection act as a data controller in a recent report, the correspondence between the Samaritains and ICO is confidential, whether the Samaritains will be fined is an interesting question.

lanaroady
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:06 am

Re: South West Water

Post by lanaroady » Tue Sep 03, 2019 1:16 pm

It was fact but i believe or as I think "I require reasonable adjustments to your service and the algorithm to account for my disability",

User avatar
embleton
Site Admin
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:40 pm
Location: Plymouth
Contact:

Re: South West Water

Post by embleton » Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:36 am

Ah, South West Water! That would also apply to SamartansRadar.

Post Reply