Cyberspace Philosophy.

[embleton]

With the forum, one can use it to philosophically intercept traffic, with timestamps forcing into the actual integrity with the moral standards of a society in classes at the least. It would be done by crossing back to the unique point to the publishing original individual domain holder. Basically a port into action. It will be linked moralistically and automagically into cyberspace for liability based on robots, some are even Thomas.

But these are real minorities living with mental illnesses. They are a minority that has views, rights, that wish to express themselves in their unique experience and language. Reasonable adjustments should be made to their rights through the disability discrimination act. This should afford them protection, to knowledge, at these levels to protect against abuse, under the care act. Those individuals when communicating with their own excessively moody low and highs in emotional expressiveness are at the thought; like those living with bipolar affective disorder. Rant...

That has been done to me these triggered firewall defence systems. I’ve seen auntie working away in cyberspace. With minor or major offensives. When that happens humans are there posts volunteering their skills for zero rewards. As respected in right to respectively be treated as having a human right, and rule on the case.

They cut the cord for further additions, suggestions and comments. Some are rather good at suggesting such in the past... And legally shut the door into a private board, and discuss the case. I received no warning of such by the establishment, clearly, they had lost for I still remain a cyberspace citizen. At its ultimate defence is to have published before submitting to the public domain. A forum, that has the rights under copyright acts to contact a human or receive those remarks appropriately published in cyberspace privately or publicly. On your own server when so encrypted over the wire or pass such information, but no robots please analysing publishing. I have a link into cyberspace that suggests philosophies.

But they seem excessive to fire false positives, across cyberspace, even some respect. That implicitly the originality cannot be blocked with a blocker. I have seen after dealing with reading those acts. This my actions I’m going to address the Copyright and Design Act, and its fair dealing policy. One of the points is written material cannot be used against a point of original publishing. It must be appropriately monitored, but the links are blocked in time and space. Invaders would be trespassing on public property. I do accept rants about removing myself from the internet, but I’ve got the upper hand that wins, and that respectively, is euthanasia if I so wish in cyberspace.

I am a public cyberspace entity, and that must be respected with all societies within a community. This is necessary for they are a minority under the human rights act, and that would lead to the cyberspace rights act, in future times backtracking through cyberspace.

A moralistic review can, of course, be taken. But free speech cannot be abolished. It is an artistic representation of our society in cyberspace. With expressiveness and original content. Even if done with artificial intelligence at the micro bit level linking each human using neurotransmitters and receptors. To the pinpoint accuracy of there firing in instances and crossing time and space when the atrocious occurs, but that's far into the future and yet to come with psychotropics or bioelectronics.

[LeoFreskos]

I PROMISE TO MAKE COOLINATOR POSTS MANDATORY IN EVERY THREAD IN THE PHILOSOPHY BOARD, LEST HE SUFFER AN INTERNET BEATDOWN BY MY HEAVY MODERATOR HAND.

AND I WILL DIG UP ALL HIS PRIVATE INFORMATION AND SEND IT TO PUB.

[LeoFreskos]

And so you basically say:

"The closest thing to truth of ourselves which cannot be deconstructed is our perceptions."

"Truth is perception."

"There are many perceptions."

"There are many truths."

Is that what you are saying? I am not sure.

Seems, then, like there is no such thing as right or wrong.